December 23, 2007 by Administrator

Beware of strangers

Stranger/Investor Oriented Life Insurance not a good idea

FAIRMONT – The West Virginia Offices of the Insurance Commissioner warns against “Stranger/Investor Originated Life Insurance.”

Known as STOLI for short, these life settlement arrangements can come in different forms and names, said Dena Wildman, insurance complaint specialist supervisor for the state Offices of the Insurance Commissioner.

For example, if something happens that affects the finances or health of a consumer, he or she may no longer have the money to pay for a life insurance policy. A company may offer a specific payment to the person, continue paying the premiums, and will become the beneficiary of the death benefits, Wildman said.

In some cases, a stranger purchases a life insurance policy from another individual for a certain amount of money, she said. Another method is when a company contacts a consumer and offers to buy a policy from him or her for cash value. One of these arrangements could involve an individual entering into free or no-cost life insurance, or someone may buy a policy just to sell it to a third-party investor. In viatical settlements, different investors will invest in a life insurance policy on a person who has some sort of life illness.

“Anytime someone’s wanting to buy your policy from you, you should always question it,” Wildman said.

She said consumers should be careful when thinking about participating in a STOLI arrangement. Persons need to determine whether a tax consequence or other problems could result if they purchase one of these life settlement arrangements. It could also cause limits on future insurability or higher premium for additional coverage.

“The first thing to consider is someone is going to make money off your death, Wildman said. “Youu’re putting your life in someone’s hands who will profit from your death, which is a scary thing.”

“They may not give you what your policy is worth. (Consumers) are not going to benefit from what they paid over the years.”

STOLI arrangements often originate from investment firms that set up trusts specifically for this purpose and often target people who are 65 to 85 years old. West Virginia doesn’t license these types of companies, she said.

Wildman said the Offices of the Insurance Commissioner receives calls from people questioning life settlement agreements and refers these types of complaints to the auditor’s office.

People may consider a STOLI life settlement arrangement if they have an illness or are in a tough financial situation, but clients can obtain accelerated benefits from insurance firms without having to sell their policy to another company, she said.

In most cases, people establish a life insurance policy to take care of family in the event of their death and designate loved ones as beneficiaries. With an accelerated death benefit, a person gets a portion of the benefits now and family or friends also receive death benefits, Wildman said.

If a company offers to purchase a consumer’s life insurance policy, the person should always investigate the business and also look into the benefits and options associated with their existing policy.

Wildman advised consumers to “know their policy and check it out first before they agree to anything. They may have an accelerated death benefit available to them.”

Source: Jessica Legge
For life insurance premium financing (not STOLI), please call a premium finance professional at 1-888-973-8377

Coming soon, a site dedicated to Life Settlement Articles (LifeSettlementArticles.com)

December 21, 2007 by Administrator

After 16 months of debate, the National Conference of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL) has adopted an amended Life Settlements Model Act (Model Act). The Model Act was unanimously adopted during NCOIL’s Annual Meeting in November. First adopted in November 2000 and last updated in July 2004, the Model Act “is a targeted attempt to prohibit controversial stranger-originated life insurance (STOLI) transactions while encouraging legitimate life settlements.”1 Although the Model Act and the amended Viatical Settlements Model Act adopted earlier this year by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) have similar objectives, there are several substantive differences between the two model acts.

Among the notable differences, NCOIL has adopted a “first-of-its-kind definition of STOLI,”2 which is defined as “a practice or plan to initiate a life insurance policy for the benefit of a third-party investor who, at the time of policy origination, has no insurable interest in the insured.”3 The definition goes on to say that “STOLI practices include but are not limited to cases in which life insurance is purchased with resources or guarantees from or through a person, or entity, who, at the time of policy inception, could not lawfully initiate the policy himself or itself, and where, at the time of inception, there is an arrangement or agreement, whether verbal or written, to directly or indirectly transfer the ownership of the policy and/or the policy benefits to a third party.”4

Another distinguishing point between the two models is the length of time a policyholder is prohibited from settling a policy. The NCOIL Model Act has a two-year moratorium on settlement, which parallels the contestability period traditionally used in life insurance contracts, whereas the NAIC model has a five-year moratorium with certain exceptions for life-changing events.

Recognizing that some commentators have criticized the five-year ban in the NAIC model as addressing STOLI at the back-end, North Dakota State Representative George Keiser, NCOIL’s Life Settlements Subcommittee chairman, said, “STOLI occurs at the front-end of a life insurance sale. By defining STOLI, and strengthening reporting requirements and penalties for participating in STOLI, the NCOIL model gets at the heart of what needs to change.”5 Despite the amendments to the Model Act, “[NCOIL] attempted to protect all of the legitimate applications of financing, trusts, and the structural options that exist in packaging products sold, both from the life settlements perspective, and from the life insurance industry,” said Mr. Keiser.6

The Model Act also includes:(1) a recommendation that states amend their insurable interest laws, if necessary, to prevent the use of trusts to benefit investors without insurable interest; (2) an annual statement requirement for contracts settled within five years of policy issuance; and (3) a penalties section addressing fraudulent life settlement acts.

Source: Mondaq

December 17, 2007 by Administrator

Interesting Life Settlement article I found discussing the back end of Life Settlement transactions. This article does not necessarily effect individual policy owners that are selling their policies. If you are interested in sell you life insurance policy, call 1-888-973-8377

Death Trap Ahead
Death bonds may sound like a good investment–but are they?

When I started seeing articles last summer about something called death bonds, it took me back to the ’90s when I was a personal finance columnist in Tampa, Florida, witnessing the tail end of the viatical settlement movement. Viaticals were contracts calling for an investor to pay part of a seller’s life insurance policy upfront and wait to collect the full amount when that person died. Viaticals originally catered to AIDS patients but were later marketed to all sorts of terminally ill folks. The viatical business worked in theory, but in practice, it attracted shady characters and enough fraudulent behavior to keep a personal finance columnist busy for years.

With death bonds, it seems the viatical settlement industry has matured and drunk the Wall Street Kool-Aid. Life settlement-backed securities are essentially spiffed-up viaticals. But this time, companies are bundling them up, dividing them into bonds and selling them mostly to institutional investors. Providers market them as good investments because they’re not correlated with traditional investments–undoubtedly true–and because they can generate returns of 8 percent a year or better. The return figures might not be exaggerated, though history tells me to keep a hand on my wallet when listening to claims made by the people who dream these things up. As long as Wall Streeters are bundling the bonds for sale to hedge, pension and mutual funds, I’ve got no complaints. But don’t be surprised to hear a sales pitch arguing that sophisticated individual investors could use some death bond diversification, too.

A couple of simple online searches tell me what I need to know for now: Many of the same characters from the old viatical business are now working the life settlement trade, which is to say that securities regulators are beginning to unearth scams. In some cases, promoters have attempted to persuade people (who aren’t terminally ill) to take out life insurance strictly for the purpose of selling it. In others, they’ve inflated the expected returns based on the life expectancies of insurance holders. It’s no wonder the National Association of Securities Dealers recently issued a warning about abusive practices in the industry.

So unless or until the industry gets absorbed by the mainstream investment community and sheds its sketchy past, steer clear.

Source: Scott Bernard Nelson is a newspaper editor and freelance writer in Portland, Oregon.

December 14, 2007 by Administrator

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. has announced the first of a new series of indices to help financial institutions, like pension funds, with exposure to American mortality and longevity rates better understand their risk in these positions.

The initial index will independently track monthly a pool of 46,290 anonymous U.S. citizens over age 65, providing real-time publication of mortality information. The results will be periodically verified by a third party.

The New York financial firm said that until now, holders of mortality risk – such as insurance carriers and reinsurers – and holders of longevity risk such as pension funds and annuity writers – had no mechanism to manage their exposures in the capital markets.

Now, hedge funds, banks and asset managers with existing positions in the cash longevity market, or those with an interest in gaining synthetic exposure to this uncorrelated risk class, will be able to use the index to either hedge existing exposure or to initiate investments.

“This will result in more transparent pricing of longevity risk, should reduce transaction friction, and will likely lead to improved economics for market participants,” said Alex Dubitsky, head of Goldman Sachs’ Longevity Markets Group.

The index also could help manage risk in a burgeoning business market that, in effect, makes hedges on death itself. The business is referred to as “life settlements.”

The way it works is a firm pays the holder of a life insurance policy a lump sum for the policy now, takes over paying the premiums for as long as the insured person lives, then collects the benefits — generally worth far more — when the person dies. The firm keeps some of the policies in its own portfolio. It sells others to institutional investors.

In April, Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse Group and Bear Stearns Co. helped form the Institutional Life Markets Association to lobby against efforts to restrict the business. If successful, Wall Street firms could buy policies directly and squeeze out the middlemen. This year, Cantor Fitzgerald LP set up an Internet-based exchange for those who want to sell or buy policy rights.

Life settlements stir objections, and not only because they make some people squeamish. Some state regulators have called life-settlement terms unfavorable in some cases to policyholders. They’ve also charged that certain arrangements flout the spirit of laws designed to keep speculators from taking out policies on strangers.

Source: Wall Street JournalÂ

December 12, 2007 by Administrator

BOYNTON BEACH, Fla.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Peachtree Life Settlements is pleased to announce that the Georgia Department of Insurance has granted it a life settlement provider license. “While we have already been servicing Georgia residents for many years under Georgia’s “grandfathering” provision, I am gratified that the license is now issued,” said Ernest Jordan, a Senior Vice President with Peachtree and head of its life finance department.

Peachtree will continue to serve residents of Georgia by offering them the option to realize the market value of their life insurance policies.

“Peachtree is one of the most experienced and highly respected companies in the life settlements industry,” said Peachtree Life Settlement CEO Jim Terlizzi. “We are excited to add Georgia to the extensive list of states in which Peachtree is licensed and we look forward to continuing our operations and our growth in Georgia and nationwide.”

Peachtree Life Settlements purchases life insurance policies from individuals, typically over the age of 65 with a life expectancy of less than 16 years, who may no longer want, need or be able to afford their policy.

About Peachtree

Peach Holdings, Inc., a Florida corporation, is the parent (holding) company of the Peach group of companies, including, among others, Peachtree Settlement Funding, Peachtree Pre-Settlement Funding and Peachtree LBP Finance Company (together, “Peachtree”). Peachtree is a specialty factoring company that purchases high-quality deferred payment obligations. Through its group of affiliated companies, Peachtree caters to people seeking to sell structured legal settlements, annuity payments, lottery prize payments, sweepstakes awards and sports contract payments. In addition, Peachtree provides cash advances to people with pending personal injury claims. Peachtree has purchased over $4 billion of specialty receivables and continues to expand into new areas by bringing institutional financing and professionalism to bear on underserved markets.

As you all should know Peachtree works with numerous Life Settlement Brokers to bring you the highest offer for your policy of the policy of one of you clients. Call 1-888-973-8377 to speak with a Life Settlement Professional.