October 12, 2007 by Administrator

Guarantee in alleged Ponzi scheme called fiction

Two indicted men pushed bonds that were supposed to ensure ‘viaticals’ payoff.

By Dale Kasler

Pouring $430,000 into obscure investments called “viaticals,” John Wilson never wavered. The deal came with a security blanket: bonds issued by a Michigan company ensuring his payoff.

“It was guaranteed and insured, and there was no way in the world you could lose a dime,” the Paradise resident said.

But the bonds were pure fiction, prosecutors say, a scam perpetrated by two Detroit-area men who played key roles in an alleged Northern California Ponzi scheme that swindled Wilson and hundreds of others.

The two men, David Goldenberg, 49, of Bloomfield Hills, Mich., and Mark Eric Wolok, 42, of West Bloomfield, Mich., were among eight people indicted on fraud charges in August by a federal grand jury in Sacramento.

The scheme centered on a Redding investment firm, but the Michigan men were essential components, officials say. The bonds they issued gave investors the confidence to put their money in.

For Wolok and Goldenberg, the indictment is the latest in a series of legal problems. The men and their various companies have been dogged for years by lawsuits, disciplinary actions, multimillion-dollar judgments and a contempt citation, almost all stemming from their involvement in the world of viaticals.

They’ve allegedly pocketed millions from phony bond sales. Yet Wolok filed for personal bankruptcy earlier this year.

Their company, International Fidelity & Surety Ltd., has its home office in Michigan, but its Web site says it’s incorporated in the South Pacific island nation of Vanuatu. In truth, it exists only on paper, prosecutors say.

“There is no company, it’s just Goldenberg and Wolok playing house,” said Michael Quilling, the court-appointed receiver who’s trying to recoup money for investors in the Redding case. Quilling is suing the pair in a separate case in Texas.

The two men, like all the defendants in the Redding case, have pleaded not guilty.

Wolok’s lawyer, Robert Joseph Peters of Sacramento, said Wolok mostly handled construction bonds. “It appears that Mr. Goldenberg handled the viaticals; he was the hands-on player,” Peters said.

Goldenberg’s lawyer, David J. Cohen of San Francisco, noted his client’s not-guilty plea but had no further comment.

The case involves Secure Investment Services Inc., a Redding firm that sold $25 million worth of viaticals since 2001.

Viaticals, or life settlements, are shares in a life insurance policy that was purchased by someone else but sold for cash. When that person dies, the investors share in the death benefit.

Besides hefty returns, Secure Investment promised safety. Bonds sold by Wolok and
Goldenberg guaranteed that clients would get paid on time if the insurance policyholders didn’t die when they were expected to.

“I wouldn’t have invested otherwise,” said Stan Finberg of El Dorado Hills, who invested $10,000.

The insurance policies are legitimate, and some Secure Investment clients did get paid. Wilson made $80,000 early on and invested another $430,000.

But officials say the Redding firm fed its clients bogus information about policyholders’ life expectancies. When the policyholders didn’t die on time, and the bonds turned out fraudulent, the scheme unraveled.

Secure Investment has known for some time of the problems with the bonds. The Redding firm, also known as American Financial Services Inc., sued Goldenberg and International Fidelity in October 2005 in Shasta Superior Court, accusing them of defaulting on their obligations. Secure Investment owner Donald Neuhaus, one of those under indictment, contends he spent $2 million for the bonds.

“It is Don’s position that he relied on them to do what they had contracted to do,” said Neuhaus’ lawyer, Bruce Locke of Sacramento. Neuhaus’ lawyer in Redding began warning investors in 2005 of serious problems with International Fidelity.

Yet Neuhaus’ firm was in trouble well before then. It was hit with a state cease-and-desist order in February 2003 for failing to register its investment securities. And officials say Neuhaus continued luring investors with phony promises long after it sued International Fidelity.

“Up to the day of their indictment … Neuhaus and his associates were continuing to sell viatical/life settlement investments by false statements and omissions,” says an affidavit by Special Agent Michael Woo of the Internal Revenue Service.

Locke, however, said Neuhaus believed he “was in compliance with the law right up to the time that they closed him up.”

Still, Quilling said Neuhaus should have known International Fidelity was a sham.

“A reasonable, legitimate businessman would have seen red flags all over this thing and would have realized a bonding company in Vanuatu and no audited financials … was not a legitimate bonding company,” the receiver said.

The South Seas connection dates to the mid-1990s, with formation of a company called
United Fidelity Corp. It was incorporated in the Cook Islands, east of Australia, and its principals were Wolok and his father, Sanford, court records show.

Just two years after it was founded, brochures distributed to viaticals investors said United had assets of $307.4 million, according to a suit filed against it by some investors in 2001. The suit,which called United a fake, is pending in Denver.

More legal problems quickly piled up. A 2002 lawsuit in Michigan accused Goldenberg and Mark Wolok of viaticals fraud. A cease-and-desist order in Florida said International Fidelity was selling viatical bonds and construction bonds illegally. Texas ordered the firm to stop selling insurance products.

Wolok and Goldenberg were sued in two more viaticals cases this year, in Michigan for $600,000 and in Texas for $45 million.

In the Texas case, Quilling, serving as court-appointed receiver, obtained judgments against Wolok and International Fidelity. The judgment is almost surely uncollectible, he said.

Wolok’s problems nearly boiled over last winter. The judge in the Denver case fined him $272,000 for contempt of court, for violating an earlier order against transferring property. When Wolok said he hadn’t remembered the earlier order, the judge said the claim was “simply not worthy of belief” and threatened to have him arrested if he didn’t pay the fine.

Just before the deadline, Wolok filed for bankruptcy in Michigan. The fine was put on hold. Wolok and Goldenberg’s next brush with the law came in August, with their arrest in the Redding case.

Other Viatical Fraud and Scam Links:
Viatical Settlement Company Pleads Guilty
Mutual Benefits
SEC Charges Brothers in Insurance Scam

October 9, 2007 by Administrator

I found this article when I was searching for more Life Settlement News. It is mainly about money laundering but then discusses a little a bit about a life settlement scenario.

The problem with this article is that his numbers do not make any sense at all. An $8 million life insurance policy selling for $4 million, then a life settlement company buying it for $6 million, and then an investor buying an $8 million dollar policy for $8 million. Even it is a paid up policy there is not return on investment. Also unless this is the case of a viatical, there is no way they are selling for that price. Life Settlements are usually 10 to 40 percent of the face value. Article is below, feel free to post your comments as well.

—–

A banking lawyer who spent two years in US federal prison in the early 1990s following a racketeering conviction told a Cayman conference this week that failing hedge funds are fertile ground for money launderers.

Kenneth Rijock now earns his living as a financial crime consultant for the banking industry helping spot questionable investments before cash from those schemes enters the financial system.

“I’m afraid of hedge funds,” Mr. Rijock told the Global Compliance Solutions conference at the Marriott Resort on Monday.

“If I’m a money launderer, I’m going to look for some hedge funds that are very distressed and maybe even about to go under,” Mr. Rijock said. “And I’m going to be the angel, the saviour. I’m going to come in there and say that I represent some South African investor, or some other well contrived story.”

“I’m going to put enough cash in (the fund) so that the manager can refund money, knowing that I’m not going to get a huge amount of due diligence (in determining where that money came from).”

“(Bank compliance officers) should understand, if you have a hedge fund you’re working with, and all of a sudden they have a major problem and then later, a huge influx in capital I’d sure like to know what the source of funds is on that.”

Mr. Rijock said there’s been a lot of international press lately on problems with the US sub-prime lending market which has affected hedge fund investments. However, he said there are other investments hedge funds make in what are usually called “traded life or life settlement” policies which he considers equally troubling.

“It’s part of the reason why (hedge funds) are failing,” Mr. Rijock said.

To help explain those types of investments, he set out a fictitious scenario for conference attendees. In that scenario, the retiring vice president of a prominent US automaker decides he doesn’t want to keep the $8 million key employee insurance policy his company had on him because the premium payments are too high.

The $8 million policy in Mr. Rijock’s scenario is sold to an insurance broker for $4 million. The broker turns around and sells it to a life settlement company for $6 million, who in turn sells it to an investor for $8 million.

“Hedge funds have been buying up these policies, because they know the returns are so high,” Mr. Rijock said. “The problem is, that some of the companies are marginally unethical and they play with these (life settlement policy) figures. They modify and alter some of these items, and some of these companies are just fraudsters.”

“So you have a bunch of hedge funds (that) are holding assets which are not performing. This is fertile ground for some money launderer to get in there.”

Mr. Rijock listed failing hedge funds among the new areas which those seeking to launder money from illicit drug sales or other illegal activities may use to hide their profits.

Source: Cay Compass

Life Settlement Info and Life Settlement Magazine are both working on life settlement hedge fund pieces, keep checking back.

October 5, 2007 by Administrator

Over the past 3 or 4 years, North Dakota’s Republican Party and Jim Poolman have been cozying up to one little corner of the viatical settlement industry. From all appearances, they specifically have been cozying up to the folks at one company: InsCap. The publicly accessible money trail between the viatical people and North Dakota’s Republicans appears to start in 2004, when Norm and Jay Taplin, two lawyers in Florida whose office does work for the viatical settlement industry, started making contributions to the NDGOP. The West Palm Beach duo — with no other obvious connection to North Dakota — contributed $4,500 to the NDGOP in 2004 and another $1,500 in 2005. If you do a little digging online about the Taplins, you’ll find that Norm Taplin was sued for his alleged involvement in an alleged viatical-related Ponzi scheme in Florida. It is reported that Taplin personally paid out $125,000 to get out of the lawsuit. [His law firms malpractice carrier paid out another $6 million, according to the Law.com story.]

Then, in 2005, the “Agents Insurance Association,” (AIA) a New York organization, contributed $5,000 to the NDGOP. AIA shares an address with a “InsCap,” the major
player in the viatical settlement industry. (Google the AIA and see if you find anything more about them than I did about them. I found next to nothing.)

In 2006 — a year when Jim Poolman wasn’t even running for office — a “Sara Bachrach” contributed $25,000 to Jim Poolman’s political campaign. The same year, an “Ira Brody” made a $15,000 contribution to the NDGOP. Bachrach and Brody shared the same street address. Brody is an executive at InsCap, the big company that does viatical settlement work of the type most benefitted by Poolman’s back-room handywork. That’s $40,000 from one New York household.
New submitted by: Jared HochelÂ

October 4, 2007 by Administrator

Florida To Develop Rule Requiring Extensive Disclosure To Viators In Viatical Settlement TransactionsÂ

On August 24, 2007, the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation (OIR) published a notice that it intends to develop a new rule that would require viatical settlement providers and brokers to make detailed and comprehensive disclosures to viators regarding the terms of the offer and the compensation to be paid to brokers in viatical and life settlement transactions. A viator is an owner of a life insurance policy who sells the policy to an investment company, known as a viatical or life settlement provider, for a purchase price that is greater than the cash surrender value of the policy. A broker acts as the agent of a viator in a viatical or life settlement transaction. Viatical and life settlements are regulated by OIR pursuant to Florida Statutes Part X, Chapter 626.

Under the preliminary text of the proposed rule, to be numbered 69O-204.101, Florida Administrative Code, a viatical settlement provider would be required to give a disclosure statement to a viator and obtain the viator’s signature on the statement prior to the viator’s execution of a viatical settlement contract. The disclosure statement would be required to include the following:

- The name of each viatical settlement broker who receives compensation and the amount of compensation received by that broker. As used in this rule, the term “compensation” would include anything of value paid or given to the viatical settlement broker in connection with the viatical settlement contract.

- A complete reconciliation of the gross offer or bid by the viatical settlement provider to the net amount of proceeds or value to be received by the viator. As used in this rule, the term “gross offer or bid” would mean the total amount or value offered by the viatical settlement provider for the purchase of one or more life insurance policies, inclusive of commissions, fees, or other expenditures related to the viatical settlement transaction.

A viatical settlement provider would have to give the viator an amended disclosure statement if anything changed regarding the broker compensation or gross offer or bid. The amended disclosure statement would have to identify clearly any information that changed from the preceding disclosure statement. The viator’s signature also would be required for the amended disclosure statement.

In addition to requiring the viator’s signature on the disclosure statement, the preliminary text of the proposed rule indicates that the viatical settlement provider also may be required to obtain the signature of any brokers who receive compensation in connection with the viatical settlement transaction.

Although viatical settlement brokers have been required since 1999 to disclose their compensation to viators pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 626.99181 OIR has not required a particular form to be provided for that disclosure, and the obligation is not placed directly on the viatical settlement provider to ensure that the disclosure has been made by the broker. The disclosure requirements of the proposed rule appear to be aimed at preventing certain practices that OIR has characterized as “fraudulent or dishonest.” The preliminary text of the proposed rule contains requirements that are similar to the new disclosure requirements of the amendments to the Viatical Settlements Model Act adopted by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners in June 2007.

OIR scheduled a workshop on September 11, 2007 in Tallahassee, Florida to receive public comment regarding the development of proposed rule 69O-204.101. If you have any questions regarding this proposed rule development, please contact Wes Strickland.

Source: Wes Strickland

Call 1-888-973-8377 to discuss your Viatical situation.

September 8, 2007 by Administrator

Structured product specialist Meteor is teaming up with EEA Fund Management to launch its first open-ended product, a viaticals vehicle targeting 8% per annum.

The Meteor Senior Life Settlement Sterling fund, which comes to market on 1 October, invests in policies issued by American-based life assurance companies such as AIG
and Prudential.

ViaSource, the specialist life settlements provider, is the investment adviser and is responsible for selecting policies. EEA’s Simon Shaw then picks from these to build the portfolio.

The product largely mirrors EEAs existing Life Settlement fund, launched in November 2005, although Meteor’s vehicle will invest in policies from slightly higher-quality companies.

Source: Investment Week

For more Viatical and Life Settlement Portfolio info, visit Life Settlement Information.